911 Lies & US Government Cover-Up, What Evidence Is There of Conspiracy?
|
911 W A S A N I N S I D E J O B
ENGINEERED BY THE CORRUPT BUSH ADMINISTRATION /
911= BASIS
of: Deceiving
the
PRETENSE TO ENTER WAR to DOMINATE THE WORLD & SUBJUGATE THE PEOPLE
DEFENSE CONTRACTS -
1000
YEARS OF NATIONAL DEBT Into
their pockets
the PATRIOT ACT has Destroyed the
President Eisenhower
*Karl Rove, Bush’s
advisor, stated in his speech to the Republican National Convention
1/20/01, that THEY NEED & WILL HAVE A WAR, IN ORDER TO BE RE-ELECTED (Bush’s
Brain, DVD).
*Cheney, Wolfowitz, Marvin Bush, & other Bush Regime War Profiteers, wrote
in their, 2000 document, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Project for a New
American Century,” that "THEY NEEDED A “CATASTROPHIC &
CATALYZING EVENT LIKE A NEW
Scientific Evidence: Laws of Science cannot be refuted; thermodynamics, gravity, propulsion, inertia. The government 9/11 Commission was comprised of defense contractors who profited from 911, or were culpable or otherwise biased
Expert Engineers in the
Fields of Construction & Demolitions report that the way the WORLD
TRADE TOWERS
(1)
the towers fell at
the speed of gravity 11 seconds, w no resistance from the floors below, in
violation of the Law Of Gravity, but consistent w the speed of
controlled demolition. Even 1/2 second resistance for each floor would
have been 45 seconds.
(2)
the Construction
of the towers had outside steel girders, & 2 rounds of inside steel
girders (47 4 ft wide), which an aluminum plane could not have passed
through, especially not the wings, & if it did, the inside girders would
still have remained, like a stereo record stacker, even as it fell.
Pictures of the construction of the towers in 1970, prove that the
Commission’s report that “the core was hollow” is not true. (3) An aluminum plane could not have gone thru 9 feet of concrete & 4 rows of 4-ft-square steel girders, but a replacement plane of depleted uranium, engineered by the dept. of defense, could, or bombs, or digital videos could have faked it. All of the videos of planes hitting are different, & the plane is always dark grey, while the rest of the picture is bright sunlight with all details & colors clearly visible. A helicopter is flying backwards in one video, demonstrating poor mixing in the fake plane video over the real NY skyline video. The nose of the plane is shown coming out another side is shown in some videos, & some show no explosion with the plane entering the building as if the building were made of soft butter. (4) Jet fuel only burns at 1,700 degrees, & would have burned up in 15 seconds, & it takes 2,700 degrees to melt steel, so the Commission Report could not have been true, that the jet fuel melted the steel girders, causing them to bend & buckle. The commission stated that the burning desks, plastics & paper melted the steel, but they only burn at 450 degrees. Steel is not melted in stoves or pots or pans. A sealed blast furnace for 2 hours & bellows of oxygen are needed to melt steel. The towers fell after only about 45 minutes of fires. Molten steel was seen flowing from the towers before it crashed. (5) Molten steel remained for 6 weeks after, which is consistent with bombs & controlled demolition, & not crushing collapse
(6)
Fire Engineering
experts report that fire has never brought down a skyscraper.
Falling buildings topple, & lean, & are incomplete destructions. Fire
burned in a tower in
(7) There are pictures of people standing in holes made by the planes, so the Commission report could not be true, that the jet fuel burned so hot, to melt the steel, & nothing could withstand it, & the girders buckled, & collapsed on the hollow core. (8) The black boxes, some body parts, & passports of the hijackers were reported to have been found, although the fuel burned so hot that it burned up the entire plane & melted steel girders, the Commission reports, but not explain how??? (9) People in the towers reported explosions before the planes hit, & multi-explosions from floors below the plane hit. I have a film of bombs going off in the basement before the collapse. Smoke was seen at the bottom of the building before the crash. (10) Squibs, an industry term for blasts flying out of the building below the level of the crash are seen in all films. (11) Marvin Bush (brother) was head of security, & shut down security cameras 2 weeks before, & that is how long it would take to set the controlled demolition, & there were fire drills for two weeks before, which would have allowed the setting. (12) The John Gotti, Jr. trial reported that the mafia was run out of a demolition company. They could have set the demolition, hired by Marvin Bush’s company, & paid for by the Pentagon to fulfill the “PNAC document*” clause that they “need a new Pearl Harbor in order to achieve world dominance & to reduce the world’s population to 500million.”(*Project for a New American Century,” written by Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Jeb Bush, GH Bush, Wm Kristol, et al).
(13)
6 of the 11
hijackers were found alive, in
(14) Most pieces were the size to fit on a truck, as in demolition. The ends of most of the girders were cut smooth, & at an angle, as in controlled demolition to make the girder fall in the desired direction. Thermate & Thermite, controlled demolition explosives, cut thru steel like butter, & at such angles.
(15)
The video of Tower
1 crashing shows the antenna at the top, descending into the cloud of
dust, before the bottom of the building begins to descend, meaning that
the top of tower 1 was destroyed before the bottom, & the top did not tamp
down the bottom of the building. –but, even if it did, then what destroyed
the top of the building?
(16)
BUILDING 7
came down, controlled demolition fashion, also, & no plane hit it!,--&
there were only small fires on 2 floors. (17) Larry Silverstien, lease holder of the WTC, was filmed saying, “We decided to Pull It.”(Zeitgiest DVD) “Pull it” is an industry term for setting off controlled demolition. After being confronted, he admitted that it was controlled demolition in building 7, --note that it would have taken over a week to set controlled demolition in that 47 story building. That is evidence that controlled demolition was, also, set in the 2 towers. (18) The World Trade Centers were built in 1970-71, as an experimental controlled environment, with no windows. In 2001,the ventilators were old, & the vent ducts were filthy & clogged with mold, which made the towers unfit for breathing, & the situation was unfixable. Also, all steel beams in the building, frame & otherwise were covered with asbestos, & was un-removable. There were millions of dollars in law suits for lung cancer, mesothelioma, leukemia, etc., & fines from the city & agencies. The towers were going to have to come down by controlled demolition, anyway, at a cost of millions. Just a couple of weeks before 9/11, Larry Silverstein took out billions of dollars of insurance, with double indemnity clauses for terrorist attacks. He demanded & received the double indemnity for each of the 3 buildings as a separate attack! (19) Of the 2,988 MURDERED in this fraudulent, evil, nefarious conspiracy, 287 were Firemen, & 67 Cops. Mayor Rudi Guilliani stated on camera that he had been warned to get out of the towers, that they were going to crash(911MysteriesDVD), --indicating that he did not know they were going to crash, but someone did, & warned him, before the crash!! --So why did they not warn the FIREMEN & POLICEMEN to get out, or wait until they were out??? Were they like Jules Vern’s Eloi people, -kept to be used, & killed, by other people? –Are all Firemen & Cops in danger of being used & killed for nefarious money profiteering projects, like this one? --Elois Cops?? . (20) The phone calls from FLIGHT 93 were obviously fraud from one script writer. No parents screamed, or cried or begged God not let their child crash & die. They all, just said “uh huh, uh huh, have a nice life, & hung up. Also, cell phone technology had not been developed enough to be used in high flying jets in 2001, indicating the supposedly heroic call from Todd Beamer & others were FAKE! –Raising questions if people from planes really were missing, what happened to them? No pieces of flight 93 were found in the crash site. GOVERNMENT COMPLICITY EVIDENCE:
(21)
Major stock
holders in the affected airlines dumped their stocks the day before 9/11in
tricky “put options”.
(22)
War games were
being conducted at the same time by the Air Force causing confusion, for a
mock terrorist attack, so that no planes came to rescue, until 2 hours or
so later. (23) There were warnings, & the government took no precautions. Osama Bin Laden was named the next day as sole responsible, but he has never been on the FBI’s most wanted list to this day. The Bin Laden Oil Industry Family was rushed out of the country the next day, with no questioning. Taliban had stopped heroin, & an oil pipeline was needed thru Afghanistan.
Along with previous corrupt Bush Administration
Tactics:
Eliminate access to courts or ways to defend one’s self, & police
protection; Manipulate the Citizens of the U.S. into being
like sheep to slaughter, By making citizens to be ignorant,
alone, afraid, dehumanized, on drugs, legal & illegal, unable to
organize, or to do any thing against the government,
Surveillance by corrupt CIA, police & corrupt government operatives;
Control the Media & Suppress Exposure of the Corruption in
Government; Silence those who speak against the Bush Administration ---
or politically black-ball, or force into homelessness. 39.5%
daily compound interest rates which can never be paid off & abolished
bankruptcy. Torture is already legalized. How long before
mass murder or concentration camps here, etc. Mass murder & subjugation
is already taking place in Africa,
Please copy & distribute this liberally. Please send money to support 911Lies in distributing this. |
|
History
even a child can understand: Author unknown Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq? A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction. Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them. Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq? A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections. Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we? A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2008 election so John McCain can win and be our president, like Bush. Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction? A: To use them in a war, silly. Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them? A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves. Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons with which they could have fought back? A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense. Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did. A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway. Q: And what was that? A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country. Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country? A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people. Q: Kind of like what they do in China? A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for low wages to make U.S. corporations richer. Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American financial gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people? A: Right. Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured? A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured. Q: Isn't that what happens in China? A: I told you, China is different. Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq? A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is communist. Q: Didn't you once tell me communists were bad? A: No, just Cuban communists are bad. Q: How are the Cuban communists bad? A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured. Q: Like in Iraq? A: Exactly. Q: And like in China, too? A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not. Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor? A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960's, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being communists and started being capitalists like us. Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists? A: Don't be a smart-ass. Q: I didn't think I was being one. A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba. Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement? A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate leader anyway. Q: What's a military coup? A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States. Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup? A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend now. Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate? A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate. Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader? A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend because he helped us invade Afghanistan. Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan? A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th. Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th? A: On September 11th, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians, hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans. Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that? A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban. Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's heads and hands? A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too. Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars in May of 2001? A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs. Q: Fighting drugs? A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies. Q: How did they do such a good job? A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off. Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for other reasons? A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for stealing bread. Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia? A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning for those who didn't comply. Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas, too? A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering. Q: What's the difference? A: It's a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers. Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name. A: Now don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends. Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia. A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan. Q: Who trained them? A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden. Q: Was he from Afghanistan? A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia, too, but he was a very bad man. Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once. A: Only when we helped him and the Mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980's. Q: Wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980's? A: Well, yeah. For a while. Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then? A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily. Q: Why did that make him our friend? A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy. Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds? A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way to show him we were his friend. Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend? A: Yep, most of the time. Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy? A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American businesses can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better. Q: Why? A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is godless un-American communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq? Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right? A: Yes. Q: But how did we know what God wanted? A: Because God speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do. Q: So, basically, the United States army attacked the people in Iraq because President George W. Bush hears voices in his head? A. Ah! You finally understand how the world works. Now go to sleep. |