|
Prominent Americans, and Others, Who Now Believe 911 Was an 'Inside Job'
Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force, under President
Reagan, and combat fighter pilot Col. Robert Bowman (Caltech PhD in aeronautics and nuclear
engineering).
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
Former CIA Intelligence Advisor to Reagan and George HW President Bush and founder of the
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, Ray McGovern
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Researchers_questioning_the_official_account_of_9/11
Department Head at UL (Underwriter Laboratories) Kevin Ryan, the company which certified the
steel which went into the WTCs upon their construction, and inspected it after the WTC collapses in
2001.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
MI6 British Counter Intelligence Officer, David Shayler
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974
Aircraft crash investigation authority, USAF Col. (Ret) George
Nelson
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
Former Chief Pentagon arms negotiator for the Middle East, USAF Col.
(Ret) Don de Grand-Pre
http://www.prisonplanet.com/022904degrand.html
Chief Economist under George President Bush, and professor at Texas A&M, Morgan Reynolds.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html
Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, former
Marine Corps officer, author or editor of more than 20 books, and co-chair of Scholars For 911 Truth,
James
Fitzer
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=122
Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, and co-chair of Scholars For 9/11 Truth, Steven Jones
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586
Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion & Theology, Claremont Graduate University, and author or
editor ! of some 30 books, including "The New Pearl Harbor" and "The 9/11 Commission Report:
Omissions and Distortions" David Ray Griffin
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6837001821567284154
Professor of mathematics, University of Western Ontario, and founder of the Scientific Panel
Investigating Nine-Eleven (SPINE), A.K Dewdney
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Dewdney
Former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury
Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Research Fellow at Stanford's Independent
Institute, and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, Paul Craig Roberts.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911#roberts
Canadian National Defense Minister, the Honorable Paul Hellyer
http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/movies/Hellyer.mov
Minister for the Environment, and Member of Parliament (United Kingdom) Michael Meacher
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8274552561914055825
National Minister of Defense (Germany). Also, served as Minister of Technology Andreas Von Bulow
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8274552561914055825
Former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces, and chief of the department for General affairs in
the Soviet Union 's ministry of Defense, General Leonid Ivashov.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ^
The 9/11 Stand Down
^
As of 2007, final
scientific reports by structural engineers regarding the collapse of
WTC 7 are still
pending, although an
progress report and
approach summary
have been published.
^
Hermann, Steve. "Simulation
finds 9/11 fireproofing key", Associated
Press. Retrieved on
July 29, 2007.
^
Bazant, Zdenek P. and Mathieu Verdure. "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse:
Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions" in Journal of
Engineering Mechanics ASCE, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp. 308-319 (March
2007). Bazant and Verdure write, "As generally accepted by the community of
specialists in structural mechanics and structural engineering (though not
by a few outsiders claiming a conspiracy with planted explosives), the
failure scenario was as follows..." (continues with a four-part scenario of
progressive structural failure).
^
Griffin, David Ray.
Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other
Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory. Olive Branch Press.
ISBN 156656686X.
^
Bush, George Walker (November
10 2001).
Remarks by the President To United Nations General
Assembly.
White House.
^
a b
c
d
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center
Disaster: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions.
NIST.
^
The Top
September 11
Conspiracy Theories. Bureau of International Information Programs,
U.S. Department of State
(28
August, 2006).
^
Strategy for Winning the War on Terror.
White House
(September 2006).
^
Wolf, Jim. "U.S
rebuts 9/11 homegrown conspiracy theories",
Reuters,
September 2, 2006.
^
Grossman, Lev. "Why
The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away",
Time Magazine,
September 3, 2006.
^
World Trade Center Building Performance Study.
^
Meigs, James. "The
Conspiracy Industry",
Popular Mechanics, October 13, 2006.
^
Behind Purdue’s computing simulation on the 2001 World
Trade Center attack ZDNET June 20, 2007
^
Purdue study supports WTC collapse findings
^
"Osama
claims responsibility for 9/1",
Times of India, 2006-05-24.
^
"Bin
Laden claims responsibility for 9/11",
CBC (Canada).
^
"America's
Day of Terror", BBC.
^
"Depuis
le 11-Septembre, la menace terroriste est devenue permanente",
Le Monde.
^
"Sept.
11: One Year Later",
Deutsche Welle.
^
"Bin
Laden tape shown days before 9/11 anniversary",
ABC.
^
"Korean's
Memories of 9/11 Still Fresh Five Years On",
The Chosun Ilbo.
^
Sales, Nancy Jo.
Click Here For Conspiracy,
Vanity Fair July 9, 2006
^
Eggen, Dan., Washington Post, Wednesday, August 2, 2006, page A03."9/11
Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon"
^
Sales, Nancy Jo.
Click Here For Conspiracy,
Vanity Fair July 9, 2006
^
Sales, Nancy Jo.
Click Here For Conspiracy,
Vanity Fair July 9, 2006
^
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
August 2, 2006
^
David Ray Griffin.
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-page Lie.
^
Multiple War Games Were Being Conducted on 9/11/01
2006-12-03
^
Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a
plane crashing into a building.
Associated Press.
^
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the
United States May 23, 2003
^
Dick Cheney: Cover Stories of the People in Charge
2006-12-28
^
Meacher, Michael
(2003).
This war on terrorism is bogus.
The Guardian Unlimited - Comment. Guardian Newspapers Limited.
Retrieved on
2006-06-11.
^
Willie Brown got low-key early warning about air
travel. Matier and Ross. San
Francisco Chronicle (2001). Retrieved on
2006-06-11.
^
September 11 Frequently Asked Questions.
^
Insider Foreknowledge.
^
Interview with David Schippers.
Alex Jones Infowars.com. Retrieved on
2006-05-02.
^
Crogan, Jim (2002).
Another FBI Agent Blows the Whistle.
LA Weekly News. LA Weekly, LP. Retrieved on
2006-06-11.
^
Grigg, William Norman (2002).
Did We Know What Was Coming?.
The New American magazine. American Opinion Publishing Incorporated.
Retrieved on
2006-06-11.
^
Kirk, Michael; Jim Gilmore (2002).
The Man Who Knew.
Transcript of Frontline program #2103. WGBH Educational Foundation.
Retrieved on
2006-06-11.
^
Who Killed John O'Neill? website.
^
The Associated Press (2005).
More remember Atta ID’d as terrorist pre-9/11.
MSNBC News - US Security. MSNBC.com. Retrieved on
2006-06-11.
^
Stocks Inquiry: Millions of shares sold before
disaster by James Doran,
The Times,
September 18, 2001
^
SEC wants data-sharing system: Network of brokerages
would help trace trades by terroristsOctober
19, 2001
^
Probes into 'suspicious' trading
September 24, 2001
^
Bin Laden rigged oil and gold prices - bank chief
2001-09-23
^
Statement of Mindy Kleinberg to the National
Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
March 31, 2003
^
page 51 of the
Commission Report,
PDF
^
Allen M. Poteshman (2006).
Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist
Attacks of September 11, 2001.
The Journal of Business. “Examination of the option trading leading up to
September 11 reveals that there was an unusually high level of put buying.
This finding is consistent with informed investors having traded options in
advance of the attacks.”
^
Insider Trading: Pre-9/11 Put Options on Companies
Hurt by Attack Indicates Foreknowledge
2007-01-17
^
Profits of Death - Insider Trading and 9-11
2001-12-06
^
David Ray Griffin.
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-page Lie.
^
Bazant, Zdenek P. and Mathieu Verdure. "Mechanics of Progressive Collapse:
Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions" in Journal of
Engineering Mechanics ASCE, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp. 308-319 (March 2007).
^
Newman, Michael (June 29, 2007).
NIST Status Update on World Trade Center 7
Investigation.
^
See Michael Ruppert's,
"The Kennedys, Physical Evidence, and 9/11",
From the Wilderness, 2003.
^
Plague Puppy, 9/11 Research
^
Dr. Steven E. Jones (2006, September).
Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings
Completely Collapse.
Journal of 9/11 Studies, Vol. 3.
^
ShyamSunder, S. (2003).
Progress Report on the Federal Building and Fire
Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster
(pdf). National Institute of Standards and Technology.Volume 4, Appendix H,
Section H.9, page 43
^
McAllister, Therese, ed. (2002). "World
Trade Center Building Performance Study"
(PDF).
Retrieved on
2006-07-03.Chapter
2, Section 2.2.2.3, page 34.
^
Lounsbury, Guy (Dec 2001).
Serving on 'sacred ground'.
National Guard. “One fireman told us that there was still molten steel at
the heart of the towers' remains. Firemen sprayed water to cool the debris
down but the heat remained intense enough at the surface to melt their
boots.”
^
Mobilizing Public Health; Turning Terror's Tide with
Science. Johns Hopkins
Public Health (2001). “"Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is
very intense," reports Alison Geyh, PhD. "In some pockets now being
uncovered, they are finding molten steel."”
^
SEAUNEWS, The Newsletter of the Structural Engineers
Association of Utah. SEAU
(October 2001). “As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still
burning and molten steel was still running.” Volume VI- Issue II, page 3
^
OFR 01-0429: World Trade Center USGS Thermal.
USGS Spectroscopy Lab (2001). “Hot spot A, which from Thermal Figure 5 has a
temperature greater than 800 kelvins, is found to have a 1000 kelvins
temperature[..]”
^
FEMA. "World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection,
Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations", Appendix C, pp. C-1 (May
2002).
^
Reshetenko T.V. et al " Study of the reaction of high-temperature H2S
decomposition on metal oxides (gamma-Al2O3,alpha-Fe2O3,V2O5)" in
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 27, Number 4, April 2002 ,
pp. 387-394(8)
^
SCHOLARS: ON ITS FIRST ANNIVERSARY.
^
Testing the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on
the WTC Towers.
^
Theories that Nuclear Weapons Destroyed the Twin
Towers.
^
Jones, Steven.
"My Response to 'An Open Letter'".
20 November 2006
^
Margie Burns. "Security,
Secrecy and a Bush Brother",
The American Reporter, January 20, 2002.
^
HCC Insurance Holdings' Press Release
September 13, 2001
^
Controlled Demolition Team. (2002).
Beirut Hilton implosion
(mpg). Beirut:
Controlled Demolition, Inc.
^
Diesel suspected in 7 WTC collapse.
New York Times News Service (November 29, 2001).
^
Frank Legge (Ph D) (November 2006).
9/11 – Acceleration Close to Free Fall
(pdf) 1,Volume 5.
Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Retrieved on
2006-12-03. “The
observed acceleration, 9.06 m/s2, if maintained, would bring the roof to the
ground in 6.2 seconds, very close to free fall in a vacuum, 6.0 seconds.
There is no sign of the slow start that would be expected if collapse was
caused by the gradual softening of the steel.”
^
Building 7's Collapse - Features of a Textbook
Implosion.
^
Larry Silverstein on PBS Documentary (video)
(2002, September).
^
Popular Mechanics. Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't
Stand up to the Facts
^
Book review: 9/11 Revealed?
September 2005
^
BBC jumps the gun when reporting Building 7 collapse
(2001, September 11).
^
Video feed of Jan Standley cut off right before actual
collapse of WTC 7 (2001,
September 11).
^
"CIA office near World Trade Center destroyed in
attacks", CNN.com.
^
Videos Released Of Plane Crashing Into Pentagon
May 17, 2006
^
Pentagon releases 9/11 attack videos
May 18, 2006
^
DoD News: Secretary Rumsfeld Interview with Parada
Magazine. Parade Magazine
(republished by Defense Department) (October 12, 2001).
^
Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions!.
^
Our Presentation from the American Scholars Symposium.
Louder Then Words. - forward to 43 minute and 06 seconds for Bob Pugh's
footage of The Pentagon minutes after the attack
^
FOIA request.
Judicial Watch.
^
Defense Department Releases Two Videos of Flight 77
Crashing Into Pentagon.
Judicial Watch.
^
CITGO Gas Station Cameras Near Pentagon Evidently Did
Not Capture Attack.
^
FBI Releases New Footage of 9/11 Pentagon Attack.
KWTX News (December 5, 2006).
^
Flight77.info's FOIA Release: Doubletree Hotel 9/11.
Flight77.info/ YouTube.
^
Doubletree Hotel security video.
debunk911myths.org.
^
Doubletree Hotel Crystal City-National Airport.
Doubletree Hotels.
^
Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the
Pentagon?.
^
Loose Change, 2nd Edition.
Louder Than Words.
^
"Conspiracy
film rewrites Sept. 11",
USA Today, April 29, 2006.
^
Jim Hoffman
The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows
March 28, 2006
^
Pentagon missile hoax: the "no Boeing" theories
discredit 9/11 skepticism and distract from proven evidence of complicity.
^
Evidence That A Boeing 757 Really Did Impact the
Pentagon on 9/11.
^
911 Myths - Pentagon.
^
Hunt the Boeing! at
the
Urban Legends Reference Pages
^
"Extensive
Casualties' in Wake of Pentagon Attack",
The Washington Post, September 11, 2001.
^
Sheridan, Mary Beth. "Loud
Boom, Then Flames In Hallways",
The Washington Post, September 12, 2001.
^
America Under Attack: Eyewitness Discusses Pentagon
Plane Crash September 11,
2001
^
Pentagon - Witness accounts.
^
- Analysis of Eyewitness Statements on 9/11 American
Airlines Flight 77 Crash into the Pentagon.
^
"New simulation shows 9/11 plane crash with scientific
detail", website of
Purdue University
^
Calum Douglas (June, 2007).
Flight 77: The Flight Data Recorder Investigation
Files. Google Video.
^
A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories,
and
Letters to the Journal of 911 Studies
(look under No Planes Hit Towers?)
^
Amics21, Flight 175, Too Hot to Handle.
^
La Vanguardia newspaper, Analysis of the Images of
9/11.
^
Popular Mechanics, Debunking the 9/11 Myths.
^
911 In Plane Site, Debunking the Debunkers.
^
ERROR: 'A Pod Was Attached to the South Tower Plane'.
^
Analysis of Flight 175 "Pod" and related claims
9 September 2004
^
Pod People hijack the 9/11 truth movement.
^
The "Pod People" And The Plane That Crashed Into the
Pentagon.
^
Reynolds Booted from No Plane Club Inducted into
'Dirty Liars Club'.
^
A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories.
^
A Critical Review of Eric Salter's Rebuttal.
^
A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories.
(updated).
^
a b
The Crash of Flight 93: Crashing Plane Leaves Debris
Field Miles Wide 2006-05-05
^
Kim, Won-Young and Gerald R. Baum.
Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001,
Terrorist Attack (pdf).
Retrieved on 11 April, 2006.
^
Families hear tape from hijacked Flight 93
April 18, 2002
^
FBI Plays UAL Flight 93 CVR Tapes Over ALPA Objections.
^
The Crash of Flight 93: Evidence Indicates Flight 93
Was Shot Down 2006-12-20
^
Flight 93 page of September11News.com.
^
The Crash of Flight 93: Crashing Plane Leaves Debris
Field Miles Wide 2006-05-05
^
Eyewitness Reports: Many Eyewitnesses Saw Flight 93
2006-04-16
^
Debunking The 9/11 Myths
Mar. 2005
^
Context of '(Before 10:06 a.m.)'.
^
Context of '(Before and After 10:06 a.m.)'.
^
60 Seconds: Ben Sliney
October 4, 2006
^
Was Flight 93 Shot Down?.
^
Pentagon: Rumsfeld misspoke on Flight 93 crash
December 27, 2004
^
Physics911 Frequently Asked Questions section.
^
ERROR: 'Flight 93 Didn't Crash in Shanskville, PA'.
^
The Crash of Flight 93: Evidence Indicates Flight 93
Was Shot Down 2006-12-20
^
Archived version of the story.
^
George W. Bush: Cover Stories of the People in Charge
2007-07-28
^
An Interesting Day: President Bush's Movements and
Actions on 9/11.
^
Achenbach, Joel.
On 9/11, a Telling Seven-Minute Silence."
Washington Post, Saturday, June 19, 2004, Page C01.
^
President Meets with Displaced Workers in Town Hall
Meeting 2001-12-04
^
President Holds Town Hall Forum on Economy in
California 2002-01-05
^
WTC film-makers still positive
4 September, 2002
^
Paltrow, S. (2004) "Day of Crisis: Detailed Picture of U.S. Actions on Sept.
11 Remains Elusive." Wall Street Journal March 22
^
"9/11 Cover-up Two-Page Summary" WantToKnow.info.
^
"The Coverup", 911review.com.
^
"9/11 Commission: The official coverup guide",
911truth.org.
^
"Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes"
CNN.com
^
"Bush Opposes 9/11 Query Panel"
CBS News
^
"Whistleblower Complains of FBI Obstruction"
FOX News
^
"9-11 Commission Funding Woes"
Time.com
^
"Bush: Documents sought by 9/11 commission 'very
sensitive'" CNN.com
^
"9/11 commission finishes Bush, Cheney session"
MSNBC
^
9/11: Missing Black Boxes in World Trade Center
Attacks Found by Firefighters, Analyzed by NTSB, Concealed by FBI.
A CounterPunch Special Report - Did the Bush Administration Lie to
Congress and the 9/11 Commission?. CounterPunch (2005-12-19). Retrieved
on
2006-10-07.
^
Jones, Steven E. (2006).
FAQ: Questions and Answers
(pdf).
Journal Of 9/11 Studies.
page 181.
^
Swanson, Gail; edited by Dennis Fisin (2003). Ground Zero, A collection
of personal accounts. TRAC Team.
^
Voice recorders could provide crucial 9/11 clues.
USAToday.
^
NEWSNIGHT Greg Palest report transcript.
BBC News (6/11/01). Retrieved on
2006-04-27.
^
Profile: Carlyle Group
(Profile: Carlyle Group).
^
Dark heart of the American dream
June 16, 2002
^
Current site of Saudi Binladin Group.
^
Saudi Binladin Group; archived version as of Nov. 2001.
^
Judicial Watch Releases New FBI Documents: Osama bin
Laden May Have Chartered Saudi Flight Out of U.S. after 9/11
June 20, 2007
^
"Fearing Harm, bin Laden Kin Fled From U.S.", by Patrick E. Tyler. The
New York Times, September 30, 2001
^
Judicial Watch.
^
"Connections and Then Some",
The Washington Post.
^
[9/11 Commission Report, page 520, footnote 56].
^
Programmed Flight Control.
^
Boeing 757-200 Background Information.
^
[url=http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/aerobatics.html|
title=ERROR: 'Pentagon Attack Maneuvers Preclude a 757'| author=Jim Hoffman]
^
Title=Flight 93| Author=Jim Hoffman
^
"Doomsday plane"
CNN
Video
^
a b
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
23 September, 2001
^
Revealed: the men with stolen identities
23/09/2001 David Harrison
^
After the Attacks: Missed Cues; Saudi May Have Been
Suspected in Error, Officials Say
September 16, 2001
^
Panoply of the Absurd
September 08, 2003
^
Saudis Arabia Admit Hijackers of Sept. 11 Attacks were
Citizens February 06, 2002
^
9/11 conspiracy theory,
BBC News Online - The Editors
^
Strange behaviour of Mohammad Atta.
^
Phone Calls.
^
Project Achilles Report.
^
More Holes in the Official Story: The 9/11 Cell Phone
Calls 10 August 2004
^
Unsafe At Any Airspeed? Cellphones and other
electronics are more of a risk than you think
March 2006
^
Phone Call Oddities.
^
The Criminalization of the State
Michel Chossudovsky 3 February 2004
^
The 9/11 Reichstag Fire.
^
a b
'Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and
Resources For a New Century'
September 2000
^
9/11: the American Reichstag Fire.
^
The Motive for the 9/11 Attack
2006-12-29
^
Gov. Pataki, acting gov. DiFrancesco laud historic
Port Authority agreement to privatize World Trade Center
July 24, 2001
^
Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?.
CBS News (January 2004). Retrieved on
2006-11-19. “"It
was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president
saying ‘Go find me a way to do this,’" says O’Neill.” O'Neill Tells '60
Minutes' Iraq Was 'Topic A' 8 Months Before 9-11
^
The document recommending Operation Northwoods:
Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962
April 30, 2001
^
David Ruppe (2001-05-01).
U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba.
ABC News.
^
"Unraveling Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories."
New York: Anti-Defamation League, 2003. p. 1
^
Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth.
^
"No Planes and No Gas Chambers".
^
Holocaust Denial Versus 9/11 Truth.
^
The Mitzvah To Remember (09/05/2002)
Gary Rosenblatt, August 3, 2007
^
The Resuscitation of Anti-Semitism: An American
Perspective: An Interview with Abraham Foxman
1 October 2003
^
The 4,000 Jews Rumor: Rumor surrounding Sept. 11th
proved untrue January 2005
^
Cashman, Greer Fay. "Five
Israeli victims remembered in capital",
The Jerusalem Post, The Jerusalem Post, 2002-09-12, p. 3. Retrieved on
2006-10-17.
^
Odigo says workers were warned of attack
Haaretz
September 26,
2001
^
The case of the missing 4000 Israelis: Truth, hoax, or
urban legend? A little bit of all three
Nov 29, 2001 (last updated, Aug 29 2004)
^
UJC Statement: IsraelNOW and Forever Solidarity Rally
September 12, 2001
^
Haaretz.com
– 5 Israelis detained for `puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy
^
Five men detained as suspected conspirators
Paulo Lima, September 12, 2001
^
The White Van:Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11
Spies? at the
Internet Archive Wayback Machine
June 21, 2002
^
Sanders, Doug. "U.S. arrests of Israelis a mystery." The Globe and Mail,
Dec. 17., 2001.
^
Ma'ariv Israeli newspaper, 23.11.01.
^
Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of
large-scale terror attacks
David Wastell 15/09/2001
^
Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive:
Suspicious Visitors to Federal Facilities (archived at Internet Archive.}
^
Archive.org link to Fox News.com: Suspected Israeli
Spies Held by U.S..
^
Telegraph.co.uk: US arrests 200 young Israelis in
spying investigation.
^
Salon.com: The Israeli "art student" mystery.
^
Sunday Herald (UK) via Internet Archive: Were they
part of a massive spy ring which shadowed the 9/11 hijackers and knew that
al-Qaeda planned a devastating terrorist attack on the USA?.
^
[An Enigma: Vast Israeli Spy Network Dismantled in the US.]
Le Monde (Paris)
March 5,
2002
^
Bush: No Saddam Links To 9/11 CBS News.
^
Bush ties Al Qaeda in Iraq to Sept. 11 Los Angeles
Times July 25, 2007.
^
No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda, 9/11 Panel
Says Dan Eggen Washington Post.
^
GOP lawmaker: Saddam linked to 9/11 CNN.
^
Iraq Linked to 9-11 and Oklahoma City BombingWes
Vernon, NewsMax.com, Sept. 9, 2002
^
The Iraq Connection: Was Saddam involved in Oklahoma
City and the first WTC bombing?
Micah Morrison, September 5, 2002
^
NEWSWEEK Poll Conducted by Princeton Survey Research
Associates International
June 23, 2007
^
War Update Newsday September 12, 2007
^
11.September - an innsidde jobb?,
Norwegian edition of
Le Monde diplomatique,
July 2006. See also English translation: Kim Bredesen,
Was 9/11 an inside job?
and
other links
^
* (French)
Pour le Monde diplomatique norvégien, le 11 septembre
est un complot intérieur US,
Voltaire Network
*
(Spanish)
El 11 de septiembre fue un complot interno
estadounidense, estima la prensa noruega
^
*(English)
Distractions from awful reality - US: the conspiracy
that wasn’t, by
Alexander Cockburn in
Le Monde diplomatique,
December 2006 *(French)Scepticisme
ou occultisme? Le complot du 11-Septembre n’aura pas lieu,
by
Alexander Cockburn in
Le Monde diplomatique, December 2006 *Template:Ir
icon
Iranian translation
*(Portuguese)
PODERES IMAGINÁRIOS - A "conspiraçăo" das Torres
Gęmeas
^
Debunking the Myths of 9/11,
by
Alexander Cockburn
and
Jeffrey St. Clair,
CounterPunch,
November 28, 2006
^
Grossman, Lev. (2006)
Time.com
– Why The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away
^
The CIA couldn't have organised this...
08/09/2006
^
The Daily Telegraph "Virgin's 9/11 Farce"[1]
^
The History Channel "9/11 Fact or Fiction"[2]
^
Walch, Tad (2006).
Controversy dogs Y.'s Jones.
Utah news. Deseret News Publishing Company. Retrieved on
2006-09-09.
^
Shermer, Michael
(2005).
Fahrenheit 2777.
Skeptic. Scientific American, Inc.. Retrieved on
2006-10-13.
^
a b Rothschild, Matthew. "Enough
conspiracy theories, already",
The Progressive, October 1, 2006.
^
Laucius, Joanne. "The coincidental cash value of conspiracy theories:
Theorists 'make the unexplainable explainable' and, in the case of works
like The Da Vinci Code, make a fair bit of money", Ottawa Citizen, November
26, 2004.
^
Shermer, Michael (June, 2005).
Fahrenheit 2777, 9/11 has generated the mother of all
conspiracy theories.
Scientific American.
^
Debunking The 9/11 Myths - Mar. 2005 Cover Story.
Popular Mechanics (March, 2005).
^
Carroll, Robert Todd
(March 30, 2006).
Mass Media Bunk - 9/11 conspiracies: the war on
critical thinking. The
Skeptic's Dictionary.
^
Bollyn, Christopher (March 4, 2005).
9/11 and Chertoff.
Associated Free Press.
^
Sullivan, Will (September 3, 2006).
Viewing 9/11 From a Grassy Knoll.
Us News.
^
Debunking The 9/11 Myths blog.
Popular Mechanics.
^
Cziesche, Dominik, Jürgen Dahlkamp, Ulrich Fichtner, Ulrich Jaeger, Gunther
Latsch, Gisela Leske, and Max F. Ruppert (September 8, 2003).
Panoply of the Absurd.
Der Spiegel.
^ Griffin, David Ray. Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular
Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory. Olive
Branch Press.
ISBN 978-1566566865.
^
Grossman, Lev. "Why
The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away",
Time Magazine,
September 3, 2006. Bill Christison is a former
senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA's
Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since then he has written
numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies...
The U.S. alliance with Israel and the power of the lobby that lets Israel so easily influence U.S.
foreign policy have been major factors in allowing the monstrous slaughter of innocent civilians in
Gaza and Lebanon. What is happening in these lands may also encourage Olmert and President Bush to
start new hostilities in Syria and heavy, possibly nuclear, bombings in Iran -- and this entire mess
of neocon pottage may lead to a new World War and clashes of civilizations and religious
fundamentalisms that these two wretched politicians seem quite literally to want to impose on the
rest of us. It’s a tough case to make that anything else going on in the world -- anywhere -- could
possibly be of equal importance.
But on July 29 and 30, and then again on August 1, something else happened that increasing numbers of
people believe is of equal importance. On these dates C-SPAN rebroadcast a panel discussion, held
originally in late June, sponsored by an organization called the American Scholars’ Symposium to
discuss what really happened on September 11, 2001. Held in Los Angeles, the meeting lasted two days,
and the C-SPAN rebroadcast covered one almost two-hour wrap-up session. The meeting was attended by
1,200 people interested in hearing something other than the official story of 9/11. The TV audience
was evidently large enough to spur C-SPAN to broadcast the panel discussion five separate times in
four days.
Even a month late, this is a lot of airtime for stories that many people call conspiracy theories --
and for which many others use nastier descriptions. It is possible that the head of C-SPAN, Brian
Lamb, so strongly disbelieves the conspiracy theories that he felt giving them ample publicity would
discredit them further. It is equally possible, however, that Lamb, who seems honestly to believe in
presenting various sides of most issues as fairly as he can (although not always giving every side
equal time), tried to do exactly that on the many legitimate questions raised about what actually
happened on September 11. In any event, C-SPAN has made a major effort to bring information on the
principal theories about 9/11 to the mainstream U.S. media. Lamb cannot be blamed for the coincidence
that recent heavy military activity in Gaza and Lebanon is nearly drowning out his efforts.
Let’s address the real issues here. Why is it important that we not let the so-called conspiracy
theories surrounding 9/11 be drowned out? After spending the better part of the last five years
treating these theories with utmost skepticism, I have devoted serious time to actually studying them
in recent months, and have also carefully watched several videos that are available on the subject. I
have come to believe that significant parts of the 9/11 theories are true, and that therefore
significant parts of the “official story” put out by the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission are
false. I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the
President Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. The items below
highlight the major questions surrounding 9/11 but do not constitute a detailed recounting of the
evidence available.
ONE: An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. Hard physical evidence supports this
conclusion; among other things, the hole in the Pentagon was considerably smaller than an airliner
would create. The building was thus presumably hit by something smaller, possibly a missile, or a
drone or, less possibly, a smaller manned aircraft. Absolutely no information is available on what
happened to the original aircraft (American Airlines Flight 77), the crew, the “hijackers,” and the
passengers. The “official story,” as it appeared in The 9/11 Commission Report simply says, “At
9:37:46, American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, traveling at approximately 530 miles
per hour. All on board, as well as many civilians and military personnel in the building, were
killed.” This allows readers to assume that pieces of the aircraft and some bodies of passengers were
found in the rubble of the crash, but information so far released by the government does not show
that such evidence was in fact found. The story put out by the Pentagon is that the plane and its
passengers were incinerated; yet video footage of offices in the Pentagon situated at the edge of the
hole clearly shows office furniture undamaged. The size of the hole in the Pentagon wall still
remains as valid evidence and so far seems irrefutable.
TWO: The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall
to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them. A plane did not hit Building 7 of the Center, which also
collapsed. All three were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the
buildings before 9/11. A substantial volume of evidence shows that typical residues and byproducts
from such demolition charges were present in the three buildings after they collapsed. The quality of
the research done on this subject is quite impressive.
If the judgments made on Points ONE and TWO above are correct, they raise many “Who done it”
questions and strongly suggest that some unnamed persons or groups either inside or with ties to the
government were actively creating a “Pearl Harbor” event, most likely to gain public support for the
aggressive foreign policies that followed -- policies that would, first, “transform” the entire
Middle East, and second, expand U.S. global domination.
These first two points provide the strongest evidence available that the “official story” of 9/11 is
not true. If the government could prove this evidence false, and its own story on these points
correct, all the other data and speculation supporting the conspiracy theories would be undermined.
It has provided no such proof and no answers to growing questions.
Other, less important points supporting the theories include the following.
THREE: For at least one hour and 45 minutes after the hijacking of the first aircraft was known, U.S.
air defense authorities failed to take meaningful action. This strikes some “conspiracy theorists” as
valid evidence that the U.S. Air Force was deliberately restrained from acting. Maybe so, but my own
skepticism tells me that the inefficiency of U.S. defense forces is likely to be just as plausible an
explanation.
FOUR: Some of the theorists believe that the 19 named hijackers were not actually the hijackers. One
claim is that the names of the hijackers were not on the manifests of any of the four aircraft.
FIVE: None of the 19 hijackers’ bodies were ever autopsied (since they were allegedly totally
destroyed in the crashes, including even the people in the Pennsylvania crash).
SIX: At least five of the alleged hijackers (or persons with identical names) have since turned up
alive in the Middle East. Nonetheless, the FBI has never bothered to re-investigate or revise the
list of hijackers. Does this suggest that the FBI knows that no one in the administration is
interested in reopening any further investigations?
SEVEN: Numerous pilots have allegedly told the theorists that none of the 19 hijackers could have
flown the airliners well enough to hit the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon with as much
accuracy as was displayed. The debate on this issue simply raises more doubt about the government’s
charge that the people it has named as hijackers are the real hijackers.
EIGHT: No one, except possibly government investigators who are not talking, has seen the plane that
went down in Pennsylvania. Some of the conspiracy theorists suggest that it was deliberately
destroyed before it hit the ground; others suggest that the plane actually landed in Cleveland and
that passengers then were whisked away to some unknown destination. What happened to them at that
point is simply a large question mark that makes it more difficult to believe this particular
scenario.
NINE: Machinations in the U.S. stock market in the days before 9/11 suggest that some inside players
in the market knew or suspected that United and American Airlines stock would soon drop. Two of the
four of the aircraft involved in 9/11 were, or course, United planes and the other two were American
Airlines planes.
It should be reemphasized that these items do not make up a complete list of all the charges made by
the theorists, but they are a good sample. Anyone interested in perhaps the best summary of these
charges should watch the video “Loose Change.”
To repeat, points ONE and TWO above are the most important. If something other than an airliner
actually did hit the Pentagon on 9/11, and if the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center
actually were dropped to the ground by controlled demolitions rather than by anything connected to
the hijackings, the untrue stories peddled by The 9/11 Commission Report are clearly susceptible of
being turned into major political issues.
A Scripps Howard News Service/Ohio University poll taken from July 6 to 24, 2006 concluded that “more
than a third [36 percent] of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11
terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them, so that the United States could go to war in the
Middle East.” The poll also found that “16 percent of Americans speculate that secretly planted
explosives, not burning passenger jets, were the real reason the massive twin towers of the World
Trade Center collapsed.”
A poll done by the Zogby polling organization two months earlier, between May 12 and 16, 2006, and
using questions worded somewhat differently, suggested even more strongly that the issue could become
a “big one” if aggressively publicized. This poll concluded that 42 percent of Americans believed
there had indeed been a cover-up of the true events of 9/11, and an additional 10 percent of
Americans were “unsure.” The co-author of the poll, W. David Kubiak, stated that, “despite years of
relentless media promotion, whitewash, and 9/11 Commission propaganda, the official 9/11 story still
can’t even muster 50 percent popular support.”
Whichever of these polls is closer to the truth, it would seem that there is considerable support for
making a major political issue of the subject.
This should be worked on at two different levels. At the first level, the objective should be
long-term, centered on making a maximum effort to find out who the individuals and groups are that
carried out the attacks in New York and Washington. Then, these people should be tried in an
international court and, if possible, convicted and punished for causing so many deaths. Such a
trial, accompanied by actual change in U.S. policies, would show that some people on this globe are
at least trying to move closer to more just and decent behavior in human relationships around the
world.
At the second level, the short term, the task should be to immediately set to work as hard as is
humanly possible to defeat in this year’s congressional election any candidate who refuses to support
a no-holds-barred investigation of 9/11 by the Congress or a high-level international court. No more
evidence than is now available is needed in order to begin this process.
A manageable volume of carefully collected and analyzed evidence is already at hand on both items ONE
and TWO above. Such evidence should be used right now to buttress charges that elements within the
President Bush administration, as well as possibly other groups foreign or domestic, were involved in
a massive fraud against the American people, a fraud that has led to many thousands of deaths.
This charge of fraud, if proven, involves a much greater crime against the American people and people
of the world than any other charges of fraud connected to the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in March
2003. It is a charge that we should not sweep under the rug because what is happening in Lebanon,
Gaza, Iraq, Syria, and Iran seems more pressing and overwhelming. It is a charge that is more
important because it is related to all of the areas just mentioned -- after all, the events of 9/11
have been used by the administration to justify every single aspect of U.S. foreign policy in the
Middle East since September 11. It is a charge that is more important also because it affects the
very core of our entire political system. If proven, it is a conspiracy, so far successful, not only
against the people of the United States, but against the entire world. Finally, it is a charge too
important to ignore simply because the U.S. government refuses to discuss it. We must force the
President Bush administration to discuss it.
Discussions aggressively pushed day after day about what really happened on 9/11 will be one of the
most important tasks between now and early November. Such discussions can, one hopes, provide
progressives with a way to jolt voters out of their apathy and inchoate willingness to support the
status quo that they think gives them security -- and encourage more voters to stop supporting
President Bush, the Republicans, and the wobbly Democratic politicians who might as well be
Republicans. A major issue like this, already supported by many voters, may prove particularly
important in a congressional election year when new uncertainties in the Middle East, new
possibilities of terrorism against the U.S. in retaliation for recent large-scale acts of
Israeli/U.S. terrorism in Gaza and Lebanon, and the corrupt almost-single-party U.S. political system
combine to make it more likely that supporters of President Bush will retain their majority this
November.
In terms of electoral impact, it would not matter whether heavy publicity did in fact force the
administration to accept a new high-level investigation of the 9/11 events. Initially, the principal
goal would be to contribute heavily to the defeat of both Republicans and Democrats who refuse to
support wholeheartedly a major new investigation by Congress or an international court. This might
result in the defeat of more Republicans than Democrats in November, but ultimately the hoped-for
goal should be the end of a system in which Democrats are barely different from Republicans, along
with cutbacks in the political power of wealth and the foreign and domestic lobbies paid for by
wealth. These are the dominant features of our system today that have practically eliminated
meaningful democracy in the U.S. This failure of democracy has happened before in U.S. history, but
this time it is likely to last longer -- at least until U.S. policies begin to pay as much attention
to the needs of the world as they do to selfish or thoughtless needs of the U.S. and of its
military-industrial complex. Attacks on the criminal events surrounding 9/11 might speed this
process.
Virtually no members of Congress, Democratic or Republican, will relish calling for a further
investigation of 9/11. For right now, in addition to other motives, the issue should be used to go
after those political prostitutes among elected office-holders who should also be defeated because
they are so easily seduced by money and power to vote for immoral wars against weak enemies.
At the Los Angeles meeting of the American Scholars’ Symposium, one of the main speakers, Webster
Tarpley, summarized his own views on the events of 9/11. He emphasized that “neocon fascist madmen”
had perpetrated the 9/11 “myth.” He went on to say, “The most important thing is that the 9/11 myth
is the premise and the root of the Afghanistan War and the Iraq War and the coming attack on Iran.
... We must ... deprive [the myth’s perpetrators] of the ability to stampede and manipulate hundreds
of millions of people [with their] ... cynically planned terrorist events.”
Let’s give Webster Tarpley and other mistakenly labeled conspiracists who have labored in the
wilderness for so long three cheers.
Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and
the Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979.
Since then he has written numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies. He can be reached at:
kathy.bill@christison-santafe.com.
Source:
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Aug06/Christison14.htm
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
|
Proof that Jets and Jet Fuel were
not the cause of the WTC collapse.
More
|
|
|
The frames from the pentagon video
should look more like this:
More
|
|
|
Project MASCAL participant pilots
flight77. Massive Irony gone unreported.
More
|
|
|
Some very Interesting parties have
been caught examining 911Lies.org.
More |
|
|
The man in the video is not Bin
Laden, not even close.
More
|
|
|
911 truth activist, On
'Hannity and Colmes'
Watch
Video
|
 |
|
Lou Dobbs Wakes Up to 911
Lies!
Recent airing, Lou details the true deception surrounding 911!
Watch Video |
 |
|
Pentagon Scene Analyzed.
Obvious Proof; NO AIRLINER!
Watch Video |
 |
|
Join Our New Yahoo! Group at Yahoo!
Groups!
Join Group |
If 911 was not perpetrated by people within our own government,
why have the following entities visited this site?
The software screenshots you will see, are from LivePerson.com, and they have documented the
following visitors:
RAYTHEON
LOCKHEED-MARTIN
US FEDERAL RESERVE
E.E.T OIL
Don't you find it odd that Raytheon, Lockheed-Martin, The Federal Reserve, and big oil companies are
the least bit interested in 911Lies.org? If they had ZERO CULPABILITY, logic dictates, they would not
be at all concerned with sites like 911Lies.org. Obviously, this is not the case.
WHAT COULD ALL THESE DIFFERENT ENTITIES HAVE IN COMMON WITH 911LIES.org?
PROOF OF SITE HITS
There are family members of airline passengers, firefighters,
police, and pentagon workers that died on 911, that are demanding the truth, and among other interested parties demanding
the truth are ex-CIA, Hi-level conservatives, and former republican administration staff members, who
all believe the 911 commission cannot be true.
CIA Man Says Cheney #1 Suspect
GET YOUR 911 BUMPER STICKERS NOW!
|
